Family Patrimony in Quebec: Assets, Deductions and Partition
- Lesson 8 of 14
- Foundations
- 23 min
- Reviewed
By James R. GosnellEducational material, not legal advice.
Key points
At divorce, separation from bed and board, annulment or death, Quebec’s family patrimony rules generally divide the partitionable value of specified family assets equally. The calculation accounts for exclusions, qualifying debts and protected contributions; renunciation is permitted only at the times and in the forms prescribed by law.
Overview
At divorce, separation from bed and board, annulment or death, (CCQ) generally requires equal division of the partitionable value of specified family assets. Death dissolves the marriage; separation from bed and board does not. Where Quebec law governs the effects of marriage, the (patrimoine familial) rules apply regardless of the matrimonial regime, subject to statutory transitional exclusions.
Each spouse retains ownership of their property during marriage, subject to protections including those for the family residence. To calculate the partition claim, identify assets under article 415, deduct qualifying debts under articles 416 and 417, and apply article 418 deductions. The spouse with the smaller partitionable mass generally has a claim for half the difference between the two spouses’ masses. Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) earnings are partitioned separately under their governing legislation.
The parental union regime, introduced by the legislation resulting from Bill 56, creates a distinct patrimony for de facto spouses who meet the statutory conditions. It excludes from that patrimony and permits certain changes or withdrawal by notarial act.
Learning Objectives
- Identify the assets and exclusions under , including residences, household movables, vehicles and retirement rights.
- Apply article 418 deductions and the to calculate the value available for partition.
- Distinguish the family patrimony from the and apply the rules on , and payment.
Purpose and Mandatory Application
Origins of the Family Patrimony
The family patrimony provisions came into force on July 1, 1989, through the legislation resulting from Bill 146. The reform addressed economic hardship at marital breakdown, particularly for spouses whose domestic contributions had not produced assets in their own names. The compensatory allowance had not fully remedied that problem.
The provisions were inserted into the Civil Code of Québec then in force and became articles 414 to 426 of the present Code in 1994. The regime treats marriage as an economic partnership and recognizes financial and domestic contributions through the equal-partition principle.
Administration and disposition remain subject to ordinary ownership rules, the family-residence protections in articles 401 to 413, and remedies preventing avoidance of partition. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 1–9.
Public Order and Exceptions
Article 423 prohibits spouses from renouncing family patrimony rights in a marriage contract or otherwise in anticipation of partition. It permits a notarial renunciation after the death or judgment specified in the provision, or a recorded judicial declaration during the listed proceedings. A renunciation of an article 418 deduction, which increases the other spouse's share, must be distinguished from a prohibited advance waiver of partition.
Transitional exceptions remain relevant: spouses married before July 1, 1989, could sign a qualifying notarial exclusion before December 31, 1990, and other transitional exceptions concern proceedings or settlements already under way in 1989. An existing exclusion must be checked before assuming the regime applies.
Family patrimony is liquidated before the matrimonial regime, without sharing the same value twice. Where the marriage has connections to another jurisdiction, articles 3089 and 3090.1 determine the applicable law. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 7, 13–21 and 51.
Application to Marriage and Civil Union
Article 521.6 extends the effects concerning family patrimony to civil-union spouses. The same asset categories, exclusions, and partition rules apply, with the adaptations required for civil union. Articles 521.13 to 521.19 govern the relevant dissolution procedures and financial effects, including dissolution by joint notarial declaration where legally available.
De facto spouses are not automatically subject to the marital family patrimony. Eligible parents may instead be governed by the separate parental-union regime; other de facto couples can arrange property rights by contract. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 13–15, and , paras. 36 and 62.
Included and Excluded Assets
Family Residences and Associated Rights
Under , the family patrimony includes the or the rights which confer use of them. This includes primary and secondary residences, such as a country cottage, a condominium in Florida or a mobile home used by the family. Properties and vacant land held solely as investments generally do not qualify. Both actual and intended use matter: a home acquired or built for the family may require assessment even before occupation.
The following interests can fall within this category:
- Co-ownership shares in residential immovables, whether divided or undivided.
- Shares in a residential real estate corporation or housing cooperative granting the personal right to occupy an apartment.
- Usufructuary rights and rights of use conferring family occupancy.
When an immovable serves both residential and commercial or rental purposes, such as a multi-unit triplex or a farm, the court apportions its value. Only the value of the portion occupied by the family as a residence falls into the family patrimony. Rental apartments, agricultural acreage, and commercial ground-floor space remain governed by the spouses' matrimonial regime or general property law. Ordinary residential leases do not contribute ownership value to this patrimony; trust or corporate arrangements conferring control and use may do so. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 24–25.
Household Movable Property
Article 415 includes that furnishes or decorates family residences and serves household use. Household furniture, appliances, rugs, curtains, and decorative art can qualify.
The analysis turns on use and function. Work tools, personal effects, and collections that do not constitute household furnishings are generally outside this category. High value or an investment motive alone does not exclude a painting that decorates the family residence and serves the household. A mixed-use item may require allocation. See JurisClasseur, , para. 26.
Family Motor Vehicles
Article 415 includes owned by either spouse and used for family travel. Registration in one spouse's name does not prevent inclusion; family use need not be exclusive, and a vehicle may also serve professional purposes.
The treatment of recreational and leased vehicles is disputed and depends on their use and the rights held by the spouses. Boats, snowmobiles and all-terrain vehicles are not systematically included. A habitable boat or motorhome may qualify as a family residence according to its use. A vehicle reserved exclusively for one spouse’s personal or business use is generally excluded. Where a lease’s purchase option has not been exercised, the lessee generally has no ownership interest to share, but any option or claimed value in the lease must be examined. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 22, 24 and 27.
Retirement Rights
Article 415 includes rights accumulated during marriage in the retirement arrangements it defines. These include qualifying employer pension plans, statutory public-sector plans, registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), and instruments receiving transfers from qualifying plans: locked-in retirement accounts (LIRAs), life income funds (LIFs), registered retirement income funds (RRIFs) and certain annuities. A commercial annuity does not qualify merely because it is intended to fund retirement.
QPP earnings and equivalent-program earnings are included under article 415 paragraph 2, but are partitioned by the administering body under article 425 and the applicable legislation. They are not added to the ordinary monetary equalization calculation.
The relevant accrual period and valuation rules must be checked for each plan under articles 417 and 426. Separation does not automatically exclude subsequent contributions: rights are normally valued when proceedings begin, although the court may use the date cohabitation ended. Public pension-credit splitting follows its own statutory period. Rights accumulated before marriage must be identified separately, including an assessment of any service bought back during marriage with marital savings. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 28–34, 44 and 52–53.
Statutory Exclusions and Other Property
Article 415 excludes property received by succession or gift before or during marriage. This exclusion applies to gifts from third parties; gifts between spouses generally cannot remove family assets from partition. An asset inherited outright is excluded; inherited money contributed to another family asset instead raises an article 418 deduction.
The retirement exclusion in article 415 paragraph 3 applies when dissolution results from death: it excludes the specified public pension earnings and rights under a plan governed or established by legislation providing death benefits to the surviving spouse. It is not a general exclusion of pensions with survivor benefits on divorce. The treatment of each spouse's plan must be verified.
Assets outside the article 415 categories generally include ordinary bank accounts, non-registered investments, business assets, and purely commercial real estate. Shares or trust rights conferring use of a family residence require separate analysis. Personal-injury awards generally fall outside the listed categories while held as money, but investing them in a family asset does not automatically create an article 418 deduction. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 25, 35–41 and 49.
Valuation and Deductions
The Valuation Date
Article 417 ordinarily values property and qualifying debts at death or institution of proceedings for divorce, separation from bed and board, or annulment. On application by either spouse or a successor, the court may instead use the date the spouses ceased living together. Earlier valuation is not automatic upon physical separation; the economic circumstances matter. Civil-union cases require the adaptations in article 521.19.
Article 421 provides a remedy for property disposed of before partition. If family property was alienated or diverted without replacement in the year before death or institution of proceedings, the court may order a for the spouse who would have benefited from its inclusion. Earlier alienation can also be addressed if intended to reduce that spouse's share. Lack of the other spouse's consent is not itself the statutory test. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 44–45 and 58.
Deductible Debts
Under articles 416 and 417, the calculation deducts debts contracted for acquisition, improvement, maintenance, or preservation of family patrimony property. Examples include the outstanding mortgage on a property’s purchase and a loan used for qualifying repairs or renovations.
The purpose of the debt matters more than its form or security. A credit-card balance can qualify to the extent it financed eligible repairs or improvements; ordinary living expenses and business borrowing do not qualify merely because they are secured on the home. The debt must be established and its relevant balance linked to the family asset. See JurisClasseur, , para. 46.
Pre-Marital Property and the Proportionality Formula
Article 418 deducts the at marriage of a qualifying asset already owned by a spouse, together with the proportional increase in its value. The following simplified formula assumes the spouse retains the same property, its value rises, and there are no additional protected contributions or reinvestments. See JurisClasseur, , para. 47.
$$\text{Initial Net Equity} = \text{Market Value at Marriage} - \text{Qualifying Debt at Marriage}$$
$$\text{Contribution Ratio} = \frac{\text{Initial Net Equity}}{\text{Market Value at Marriage}}$$
$$\text{Deduction} = \text{Initial Net Equity} + \text{Contribution Ratio} \times (\text{Value at Valuation Date} - \text{Value at Marriage})$$
In that simple appreciation case, the same deduction equals the contribution ratio multiplied by the value at the valuation date.
$$\text{Partitionable Value} = \text{Value at Valuation Date} - \text{Qualifying Debt at That Date} - \text{Deduction}$$
The remaining value includes debt reduction during marriage and the share of appreciation not protected by the initial-equity ratio. Pre-marital cash savings later used to buy a family asset do not automatically receive this deduction: they must be distinguished from protected gifts, inheritances, or the reinvestment of an existing family asset. Depreciation and successive reinvestments require separate analysis. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 47–49.
These hypothetical examples assume that the stated values, debts and deductions are proved and that no other assets affect the partition claim.
Example: A Home Owned Before Marriage
Factual Scenario
Spouse A purchased a residence in 2012 for $250,000, paying $50,000 cash and financing the balance with a $200,000 hypothecary loan. In 2016, Spouse A married Spouse B. At marriage, the home was appraised at $300,000, with a hypothec balance of $180,000.
During marriage, the spouses made mortgage payments from joint accounts. In 2026, the spouses instituted divorce proceedings. At filing, the residence was appraised at $600,000, and the remaining hypothec was $60,000.
Counsel calculates the deduction:
- Determine Spouse A's pre-marital net equity:
$$\text{Net Pre-Marital Equity} = $300,000 - $180,000 = $120,000$$
- Calculate the contribution ratio:
$$\text{Contribution Ratio} = \frac{$120,000}{$300,000} = 40% \text{ (or } 0.40\text{)}$$
- Calculate the statutory deduction at the filing date:
$$\text{Deduction} = 40% \times $600,000 = $240,000$$
- Calculate the net partitionable value:
$$\text{Gross Value} = $600,000$$
$$\text{Less Remaining Hypothec} = -$60,000$$
$$\text{Net Equity Before Deduction} = $540,000$$
$$\text{Less Deduction} = -$240,000$$
$$\text{Net Partitionable Value} = $300,000$$
- Equal partition:
$$\text{Each Share} = \frac{$300,000}{2} = $150,000$$
Spouse A retains title and owes Spouse B a partition payment of $150,000. Spouse A retains $390,000 in net value ($240,000 deduction + $150,000 share), while Spouse B receives $150,000.
Contributions from Gifts and Inheritances
A cottage inherited outright from a third party is excluded under article 415. A cottage purchased with inherited money and borrowed or other funds instead requires a deduction calculation.
For a protected monetary contribution used to acquire or improve a family asset, article 418 paragraphs 1 and 2 deduct the contribution and its proportional subsequent increase in value. The denominator is the gross value of the property at the time of the contribution, not merely the cost of the improvement:
$$\text{Protected Ratio} = \frac{\text{Protected Contribution}}{\text{Gross Property Value at Contribution}}$$
$$\text{Deduction} = \text{Protected Contribution} + \text{Protected Ratio} \times \text{Subsequent Increase in Property Value}$$
For an acquisition contribution in a straightforward appreciation case, this equals the ratio multiplied by the later gross value. Article 418 paragraph 3 carries deductions into qualifying reinvestments of family property. The spouse claiming the deduction must establish the source and use of funds; bank records, deeds, and receipts can do so. Co-ownership alone does not presume waiver of the deduction. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 37, 47 and 51.
Example: A Cottage Bought with Inherited Funds
Factual Scenario
During marriage, Spouse C bought a family cottage for $400,000 and remained its sole owner. C contributed $100,000 inherited from a parent. A $300,000 hypothecary loan financed the balance, with both spouses as borrowers. The purchase deed identified the use of the inherited funds (remploi).
At the agreed valuation date in the 2026 divorce proceedings, the cottage market value was $700,000, and the joint hypothec balance was $140,000.
Counsel applies the contribution deduction under :
- Calculate the reinvestment ratio:
$$\text{Reinvestment Ratio} = \frac{$100,000}{$400,000} = 25% \text{ (or } 0.25\text{)}$$
- Calculate the statutory deduction:
$$\text{Deduction} = 25% \times $700,000 = $175,000$$
- Calculate the net partitionable value:
$$\text{Gross Value} = $700,000$$
$$\text{Less Remaining Debt} = -$140,000$$
$$\text{Net Equity Before Deduction} = $560,000$$
$$\text{Less Deduction} = -$175,000$$
$$\text{Net Partitionable Value} = $385,000$$
- Equal division:
$$\text{Each Share} = \frac{$385,000}{2} = $192,500$$
Spouse C keeps the property and owes Spouse D a partition payment of $192,500. The lender must agree to any release of Spouse D from the hypothecary loan; the partition alone does not release a co-borrower.
Unequal Partition, Renunciation and Payment
Unequal Partition Under
Equal partition is the rule. On application, article 422 allows unequal partition or no partition where equal division would cause injustice, considering in particular the brevity of the marriage, waste of property, or a spouse's bad faith. These grounds are examples; the court must assess whether equal partition would cause injustice in the circumstances.
In M.T. v. J.-Y.T., 2008 SCC 50, the Supreme Court emphasized the economic nature of the inquiry and the limited scope of this exception. Unequal financial contributions, income disparity, or greater wealth do not by themselves justify departing from equality. Bad faith must be assessed in its economic context; the remedy does not punish ordinary marital misconduct.
No fixed marriage duration determines the outcome. Proven dissipation or conduct exceptionally incompatible with the economic partnership may support relief, depending on its effect and the whole record. Article 422 separately permits no partition of QPP or equivalent-program earnings where equality would cause injustice; it does not authorize unequal percentages of those earnings. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 54–56, and the Supreme Court judgment.
Example: A Short Marriage and Dissipation of Property
Factual Scenario
Assume Spouse G owned an $800,000 condominium free of debt at marriage and its value rose to $900,000 during a 14-month union. Spouse H is alleged to have forged loan documents and lost $50,000 of joint funds gambling. G also accumulated qualifying pension rights during the marriage.
The condominium calculation comes first. With a 100% initial-equity ratio and no later transaction affecting the deduction, article 418 protects the initial $800,000 plus the $100,000 increase, leaving no partitionable condominium value. G does not need an article 422 order merely to protect that increase.
G can seek unequal or no partition of remaining family patrimony, but must prove the alleged conduct and the injustice that equal division would cause. Fourteen months is not an automatic exclusion, and differences in contributions alone do not decide the application. Any separate claim to recover the $50,000 requires a legal basis and proof, without double recovery. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 47 and 54–58, and M.T. v. J.-Y.T., 2008 SCC 50.
When and How to Renounce Partition
Article 423 prohibits advance renunciation but provides two authorized routes:
- A notarial act en minute made after the spouse’s death or the judgment of divorce, separation from bed and board, or annulment.
- A judicial declaration recorded during proceedings for divorce, separation from bed and board, or annulment. It can be presented to the court before the final judgment.
Civil-union cases require the corresponding statutory adaptations. Private correspondence alone does not complete the required renunciation. Article 423 paragraph 3 requires registration in the Register of Personal and Movable Real Rights (RDPRM) within one year from the opening of the right to partition; otherwise the renouncing spouse is deemed to have accepted.
Article 424 permits annulment of a notarial renunciation for lesion or another ground of contractual nullity. The partition right is transmissible, subject to applicable succession and capacity rules. A general family-patrimony waiver does not automatically waive QPP splitting. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 12 and 59–64.
Creditor Protection and Fraudulent Renunciations
Creditors may challenge a prejudicial renunciation under the applicable general rules, including the action in inopposability in articles 1631 to 1636 and, where relevant, insolvency legislation.
A creditor alleging that a renunciation fraudulently prejudiced its rights must prove the requirements of the relevant remedy. Relief and enforcement are not automatic merely because the renouncing spouse owes money. Article 424's separate remedy for contractual invalidity or lesion must not be confused with creditor inopposability.
Payment and Transfers in Payment
Articles 419 and 420 govern payment of the partition claim. Payment can be made in money or through a of property; property outside the family patrimony requires the spouses' agreement for that purpose. The court can assign specific family property and, if necessary to avoid prejudice, permit instalments over no more than ten years and impose appropriate security or other terms.
The ordinary partition debt, the article 421 compensatory payment for certain disposed-of assets, and the compensatory allowance under articles 427 and following are separate remedies. A property transfer or refinancing must also address existing creditors' rights; a judgment between spouses does not by itself release a co-borrower from the lender's contract.
The transfer of retirement rights depends on the governing statute and article 426. The provision limits transfers to one-half of the member's total accumulated rights and prevents the recipient obtaining greater rights than the member. Eligible direct RRSP transfers under paragraph 146(16)(b) of the Income Tax Act can defer taxation where statutory conditions are met; a cash withdrawal is not an equivalent rollover. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 52 and 65–66, and CRA guidance on direct RRSP transfers.
Example: Retirement Rights and Tax Treatment
Factual Scenario
Assume the spouses' qualifying rights accumulated during marriage are valued on a comparable basis: Spouse E has a $200,000 RRSP and $150,000 in a supplemental pension plan; Spouse F has a $50,000 RRSP. There are no other partitionable assets or deductions. QPP splitting occurs separately under article 425 and its governing legislation.
$$\text{Total} = $200,000 + $150,000 + $50,000 = $400,000$$
$$\text{Equal Share} = $200,000$$
Spouse F already holds $50,000, leaving a $150,000 equalization. Subject to the plan and tax rules, the claim could be paid through a $100,000 direct RRSP transfer and a transfer of $50,000 in supplemental pension rights. The administrator must confirm each permitted transfer and destination, including the article 426 limit where applicable.
When comparing retirement rights with cash or real estate, potential taxation requires evidence appropriate to the particular assets and transfer method. Any tax adjustment depends on that evidence rather than a fixed percentage. The principal-residence exemption also has conditions. A qualifying direct rollover defers taxation; later withdrawals remain taxable. See JurisClasseur, , paras. 50, 52 and 66.
Comparing the Two Patrimonies
The Parental Union Regime
An Act respecting family law reform and establishing the parental union regime, SQ 2024, c. 22, resulted from Bill 56 and received assent on June 4, 2024. The parental-union provisions took effect on June 30, 2025.
Under article 521.20 and the transitional provisions, the regime applies automatically to people who become parents of a common child after June 29, 2025, and are or become de facto spouses. They must share a community of life and present themselves publicly as a couple. An existing marriage, civil union or parental union can delay the new union’s formation; a prohibited family relationship prevents it. A child's birth alone does not establish all these conditions.
Eligible parents of an earlier common child can voluntarily join by notarial act en minute or a private agreement signed before two witnesses. The union begins when the agreement is signed. The transitional agreement may also address exclusions, subject to the statutory rules and confirmation requirements if a later common child is born or adopted. See the enacted statute, sections 3 and 45–48 and current Quebec guidance on voluntary formation.
Assets and Deductions
Article 521.30 includes family residences or rights conferring their use, household furnishings, and motor vehicles used for family travel. Gifts and inheritances are excluded; a minor spouse's property enters only upon reaching full age. Retirement rights are not included in the statutory list.
| Feature | Family patrimony | Parental union patrimony |
|---|---|---|
| Persons concerned | Married and civil-union spouses, subject to applicable-law and transitional rules | Spouses meeting the parental-union conditions, automatically or by valid voluntary agreement |
| Family residences, furnishings and vehicles | Included under article 415, subject to its conditions and exclusions | Included under article 521.30, subject to its conditions and exclusions |
| Retirement rights | Qualifying rights and public pension earnings included, with special death and execution rules | Excluded from this patrimony; separate pension legislation or valid agreements may still apply |
| Withdrawal | Advance waiver prohibited, subject to statutory exceptions | Specified changes or mutual withdrawal during the union by notarial act; later renunciation is distinct |
| Deductions | Article 418 | Article 521.36, which also protects qualifying contributions from pre-union property outside the patrimony and specified fruits and revenues |
The deduction rules differ. In particular, pre-union savings may qualify for a parental-union contribution deduction where the corresponding marital deduction would not apply. See CCQ articles 521.30–521.36 as enacted; JurisClasseur, , para. 49, and , para. 31.
Withdrawal and Renunciation
Article 521.21 makes the parental-union rules mandatory except where the law expressly permits derogation. Withdrawal from its patrimony does not remove all other effects of the union.
Under articles 521.31 and 521.33, spouses may agree during the union to exclude specified assets or withdraw from the patrimony rules by notarial act en minute. An automatic-regime withdrawal cannot be completed before the union begins. Withdrawal ordinarily takes effect on the act's date; if recorded within 90 days of the beginning of the union, the patrimony is deemed never to have been established. A later withdrawal opens the right to partition the value accumulated under the applicable rules.
After the union ends, article 521.41 permits a spouse to renounce partition by notarial act en minute or a judicial declaration recorded in a family proceeding. Registration in the RDPRM must occur within one year of the end of the union, failing which the renouncing spouse is deemed to have accepted. This is distinct from mutual withdrawal during the union. See the statutory withdrawal and renunciation provisions and Quebec's explanation of withdrawal.
Practice Checklist
- Check applicable law, marriage or civil-union dates, and any valid historical exclusion.
- Identify the article 415 assets, ownership interests, family uses, and statutory exclusions; assess mixed-use and trust or corporate arrangements.
- Establish the proper article 417 valuation date and obtain evidence of market values and qualifying debt balances.
- Trace pre-marital family assets, gifts, inheritances, and qualifying reinvestments; distinguish pre-marital savings and examine any waiver of deductions.
- Apply article 418 to each spouse's mass, then calculate the equalization; keep QPP earnings outside that monetary calculation.
- Obtain plan-specific retirement statements and check accrual periods, transfer limits, tax treatment, and execution rules.
- Examine evidence supporting article 421 compensation or an exceptional article 422 application without assuming relief is automatic.
- Verify the timing, form, and RDPRM registration of any renunciation and separately address public pension splitting.
- Structure money payments, transfers, instalments, and creditor releases under the applicable rules.
- For de facto parents, verify the parental-union formation conditions and distinguish contribution deductions, asset exclusions, withdrawal, and renunciation.
Check your understanding
Two short exercises before you move on: reason through the lesson’s worked examples, then recall its key terms from memory.
Apply the rules
Each worked example gives the facts first and keeps its analysis closed. Decide the outcome, then open the analysis to compare.
Active recall
1 / 12Formulate your answer before revealing the definition. Your self-assessment schedules a review; it does not measure mastery.
family patrimony
patrimoine familial
How would you define this concept? Which conditions or limits matter?
Glossary
- compensatory paymentpaiement compensatoire
- A remedy under for certain family property alienated or diverted without replacement; distinct from the compensatory allowance.
- family patrimonypatrimoine familial
- A group of family assets whose partitionable value is generally divided equally at divorce, separation from bed and board, annulment or death, subject to statutory exclusions, deductions and exceptions ().
- family residencesrésidences de la famille
- Principal and secondary dwellings, whether owned directly or held through rights conferring their use, used by spouses for family life ().
- motor vehiclesvéhicules automobiles
- Vehicles owned by either spouse used for family travel, even where use is also professional ().
- movable propertymeubles meublants
- Furniture, appliances, and decorative items that furnish or decorate family dwellings and serve household use ().
- net valuevaleur nette
- The market value of family patrimony property minus qualifying acquisition, improvement, maintenance, and preservation debts under
- parental union patrimonypatrimoine d'union parentale
- A distinct patrimony for spouses meeting the parental-union conditions, excluding retirement rights and permitting specified notarial withdrawals.
- proportionality formulaformule de proportionnalité
- Article 418 deductions for qualifying pre-marital net value or protected contributions, together with the related proportional increase in value.
- renunciationrenonciation
- A formal waiver made at the time and in the form authorized by , including a recorded judicial declaration during matrimonial proceedings.
- retirement rightsdroits de retraite
- Pension entitlements accumulated during marriage under supplemental plans, the Quebec Pension Plan, and registered retirement savings plans ().
- transfer in paymentdation en paiement
- An agreed or court-ordered transfer of property under to satisfy a family patrimony partition claim instead of paying money.
- unequal partitionpartage inégal
- A court-ordered departure from equal division under where equality would cause injustice, considering in particular a short marriage, bad faith or dissipation of property.
References and Further Reading
- JurisClasseur Québec, coll. « Droit civil », Personnes et famille, , « Patrimoine familial », particularly paras. 1–21, 22–41 and 43–66.
- JurisClasseur Québec, same collection, , paras. 36, 62 and 65; , para. 31.
- Official consolidated CCQ, current through April 7, 2026, PDF pages 105–108 (arts. 414–426) and 127–130 (arts. 521.29–521.42).
- Civil Code of Québec.
- M.T. v. J.-Y.T., 2008 SCC 50, particularly paras. 19–32.
- An Act respecting family law reform and establishing the parental union regime, SQ 2024, c. 22, ss. 3 and 45–48; official legislative history.
- Quebec guidance on voluntary parental union.
- Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), para. 146(16)(b); CRA guidance on direct RRSP transfers.